Three reason why I love New York(ers)
1 NY enjoys street-life; they love the small outdoors and don't bother keeping up appearances.
Watch video of a collision of street vendors, bums and a pissed brass band.
2 NY knows that art first of all is a way of live before you may sell it or turn it into a career.
Watch video of one of the numerous community gardens and urban farms.
3 NY poors out energy everywhere and the peeps moves on through like they just don't care.
Watch video of a Saturday after noon at Broadway and Union Square.
Nowamsane?
zondag 20 oktober 2013
maandag 14 oktober 2013
Abstract
What is
this all about?
Economists suggest that creative cities breed
innovative economies. Statistics show more patents, intellectual property
claims and more new innovative start-ups at cities and regions where more
artists work and live. So art may play an important role in a learning society
but the big - until now not well answered - question is: How? How does art make
us smart? So I'm not thinking about art therapy, art education or community
art. I am thinking about the catalyst effect of artists on the growth and
flourish of their community.
What am
I doing?
I'm digging into a couple of cases of
innovative and trend setting art practices and art scenes in urban
environments. At the moment I'm talking with artists who are upfront in
colonizing new spaces and setting trends in NYC hotspots like NW Brooklyn, East
Village and SE Queens. And to clarify their statements I observe and
participate in their practices. I want to know how they work on a daily basis
and how they involve the public in their work and practice. I want to find out
how the conversation between them and their community is shaped and how
learning opportunities may occur in these settings.
Why
NYC?
I don't need to explain that New York City is
happening, economically as well as artistically. Besides that it is clear that
NYC and the Netherlands have a lot in common, historically, economically and
culturally. You could claim that NYC is (New) Amsterdam in overdrive. Best New
York practices could very well be exported to the Netherlands, perhaps adapted
in scale and pace.
At the same time I'm studying best practices in
the Netherlands to compare them with the New York cases. Until now I studied
Freehouse in Rotterdam, and more Dutch cases will follow in 2014.
In real life 08 - October 2013
When I opened the paper bag the suspense wasn't over yet. In the bag
there was this cardboard box with a picture on it of a man with presumably
adorable ladies at each of his sides. "Make it a big night. Do late night
Right" the box red. Checkers does not sell fries. They sell self-esteem.
Browsing the shop at
MoMA Ps1 it occurred to me that most art magazines did not have works of art on
the cover but people. Apparently we are more interested in the makers then in
the actual work of art. Maybe art is nothing but a vehicle to move into a way
of life that we desire and that these artists are role models for this
lifestyle. Maybe we don't even really enjoy the art they are making, we just
want to be with them, be seen in their company.
When I opened the box at checkers I was shocked
watching the content. I understood that the cover was necessary to contradict
my gut feeling and reduce my feeling of guilt. Here the comparison with the art
magazine seems to go wrong. The works of art within the wrapping of the magazine appear to be
far more tasteful then the loaded fries. I do not see any need to contradict my
gut feeling or to reduce my feeling of guilt. So why do these art magazine covers focus
on the artist instead of on the work of art?
zaterdag 21 september 2013
In the Field 09 - Reconstructing my search for situated art - spring and summer 2013
For a
better understanding of the transformative power of art(-ists) I've been searching
for situated art practices. In situated art artists include the physical and social
environment in their work. In these situated art settings I'm looking for learning oportunities offered to the public.
March 28th 2013 I had my first meeting with professor Victoria Marsick and professor Lyle Yorks at Columbia University at the upper west side of Manhattan. They appeared to be very knowledgeable, friendly and helpful. With Victoria - who is an expert in informal learning or "learning without knowing that you are learning" - I planned to have regular meetings with her together with her husband Peter Neaman who is well informed about the New York art scene. Professor Lyle Yorks immediately gave me a booklet called: "Can art change the world?” reporting a research he had conducted in 2005 on the transformative power of community art. This reading material appeared to be very useful and since the author of the report, Abby Scher, was living in NYC I managed to contact her for an appointment.
March 28th 2013 I had my first meeting with professor Victoria Marsick and professor Lyle Yorks at Columbia University at the upper west side of Manhattan. They appeared to be very knowledgeable, friendly and helpful. With Victoria - who is an expert in informal learning or "learning without knowing that you are learning" - I planned to have regular meetings with her together with her husband Peter Neaman who is well informed about the New York art scene. Professor Lyle Yorks immediately gave me a booklet called: "Can art change the world?” reporting a research he had conducted in 2005 on the transformative power of community art. This reading material appeared to be very useful and since the author of the report, Abby Scher, was living in NYC I managed to contact her for an appointment.
I also had conversations with several professors
of the Art and Education department of Columbia University and with a number of artists and experts
I had been introduced to by my fellow graduate student Lynda Hallmark. So I
started with the back up of a dozen experts I could talk to about my quest. First I asked them where
to start looking for research cases in NYC. And by the end of April I had a
substantial list of people to meet and places to visit. In this blog I will
tell you about those who where most interesting to me. This list would expand
and specify as I dug into the cases that emerged and talked to curators and
artists on the spot.
On hindsight it appeared
that two of the three cases I ended up with were already on this early list.
Professor Richard Jochum suggested I should check out the Flux Factory
in Queens and Sean Justice mentioned an artist group called the
Bruce High Quality Foundation (BHQF). But to get to the point of
selecting these cases I had to check all the other options, evaluate them and
see if I could get a proper entrance into the setting. During this search I
made a lot of notes with I will combine with this journal to a final report for
my dissertation.
But I did not come to NYC to
just talk to people. I wanted to be part of it and so I paid a lot of visits to
museums and institutions like the "Cultural and Educational Centre Clemente Soto Velez"
on the lower east side and an artist production and development facility "3rd Ward"
in Brooklyn. Events I attended to during this period were "Ideas City"
organized by the New Museum and the "Red Bull Music Academy". All these
institutions and events had adopted the mission to combine arts and education
in a public setting.
Looking for a place to stay
I decided to look for private bed and breakfast on the Internet. So for the
period I stayed in NYC I wandered from one place to another living out of a
suitcase. This gave me the opportunity to get to know the city very well from
different angles and from the inside out. During this first period I stayed in
Manhattan at the Upper west side, East Harlem aka "El Bareo", the
university quarter Morningside Heights, West and East Village, and in Brooklyn
at Prospect Heights, Williamsburg and Cobble Hill.
Sculpture garden and cafe at the Met |
At the same time I also got
a good impression of New York's public, popular and informal art because I was
changing work and living spaces frequently. By constantly traveling up and
about to and from my appointments and visits (I had bought a bike), I prevented
getting stuck in a single corner of the city. This way I got a very good feel
of NYC's enormous variety of formal, non-formal and informal art, not being
guided by institutionalized and commercialized information channels but in the
same way as average New York citizens were living their everyday cultural life.
Community Garden Theatre @ Avenue B |
One simple visit could lead
to a whole string of investigation, like my visit to the symposium I mentioned
earlier in this blog called "the post modern hangover" dealing with
present Avant-garde in literature and art. At this symposium I heard about an
anonymous art movement by the name of "Tiqqun" that on first sight
reminded me of the Situationiste Internationale. Inquiring this movement I was
led to a couple of galleries on the lower east side of Manhattan and I found
out that their ideas, especially their writings were helpful
in order to articulate my thoughts about my research on the subject of art and
social change. It made me understand that I entered a realm that includes not only politics of merry progress but of dark views as well. The movement however seemed to be based in Paris and one of the
members appeared to be involved in illegal political activities, so I decided
to let this lead go.
Or my acquaintance with
artist and professor Richard Jochum who invited me from the moment we met to
take part in several of his performances and presentations. This way I ended up
as a participant in several galleries and art events: the Elgar Wimmer gallery
in Chelsea, the Emily Harvey Foundation in Soho and the Bushwick open studios.
During these early explorations two cases got most of my attention: Flux factory and a group of artists active within the Occupy movement.
I encountered the
latter during a so-called Jane Jacobs walk in the Meat Packing district
organized by the Metropolitan Art Society.Together with other visitors I was
led through the neighborhood by a guide who told us about the history and
future perspectives of this part of town. His story was regularly interrupted
by small and short theatrical performances on location. At the end of the tour
I contacted the performing artists who appeared to be activists of the occupy
movement seeking ways to inform and mobilize the public on the fracked-gas pipeline currently under
construction in Manhattan's West Village.. Since this could be an
interesting case for my study I joined their organization for a couple of weeks
attending to meetings and rallies.
During these early explorations two cases got most of my attention: Flux factory and a group of artists active within the Occupy movement.
"Jane" (Monica Hunken) speaks to the audience |
At the same time I was
visiting Flux Factory in Queens. They had a workshop going on in which a group
consisted of artists, architects and neighborhood kids were designing and
building a "kitty city". (check my earlier report in this blog)
It was a
typical setting of situated art: parents, kids, artists and educators working together and at the same time they themselves were actually a part of the work of art. Not in an educational setting or as part of a sucial cultural intervention program but just as they were: creative citizens making art.
Opening of Kitty City at Flux Factory |
Investigating the history
of the Flux Factory I found out that they had organized many projects of this type of situated art
through the years. They started twenty years ago as early creative settlers in
Williamsburg where they lived in an abandoned factory at the now so hip and
gentle Kent Avenue. They appeared to be an authentic New York streetwise
Avant-garde. So I got in touch with their curator, showed him my art portfolio
and he invited me to their "Flux Thursday". This event is a monthly
potluck gathering where the artists of FF present and discuss their work in
progress. From that moment on I was in the scene as a peer at the work floor
and I picked FF up as a case. Now I attend to most of their activities and talk
a lot to many of the people involved.
Early Summer June/July
It was my goal to have found
and selected at least two cases to study by the end of May. Scrutinizing the
settings found so far I had to conclude that only one of them, the flux
factory, was really suitable as a case for my research. Becoming slightly
nervous I started digging into this case while contacting my supporters to
inform them about my very interesting but slow progress. Beside the conclusion
to keep calm and to carry on Ruud van der Veen suggested that I should try to
focus on the performing arts. Until now most of my inquiry was concerning
mostly visual arts he argued and I agreed.
Todd Patrick |
One of my supporters put me
into contact with Thomas Fichter director of the "Earl Brownfoundation" for contemporary music with whom I had several very
interesting conversations about the New York art world. He suggested me to
check out the "Gramsci Monument" in the Bronx by Thomas Hirschhorn.
Gramsci Monument in the Bronx |
In the mean time I found out
that Moma's department of education was bringing together contemporary artists
in dialogue with Moma educators to conceptualize ideas for developing
innovative and experimental public interactions. This project was called:
"artists experiment". In their studio Caroline Woolard had set
up an Exchange Cafe where people were invited to barter their talents. These artist experiments are very interesting for my research so I
visited the Moma studio several times. However talking to the artist I found
out she seriously doubted if this project could be considered to be art and so
her practice could not be considered an optional research case. Besides that it was clear that these
activities in Moma were set up as a formal or non-formal education program and
my focus is on informal (unnoticed, unintended) learning in and around art practices.
Left: BHQF rat in the streets of Brooklyn. Right: BHQF rat in theBrooklyn museum |
Now on second look I found out that, although Brooklyn based, the BHQF were
especially active in the east village. So I started to dig into the rich
variety of cultural community life in this neighborhood, visited poetry
readings in Tompkins Park, public painting sessions and the many performances
in the numerous community gardens of this part of the city.
"Art in the Park" in Alphabeth City |
The second case I ran into
during the last Flux Thursday of the season. I was talking to a couple of the
resident artists at flux, and after I had explained my research one of them
introduced me to Anne Apparu also present at the potluck. She appeared to be
the working on another experimental project at Moma called "theColony" at nearby Ps1 also in Queens.
The colony was designed by
the Argentinean architecture firm a77 on invitation of the Moma curator of
architecture Pedro Gaganho. It actually formed a living space for artists,
scholars, architects, and other cultural agents within the Ps1 premises. During
the course of the summer several guests were invited by curator Jenny Schlenzka
to live at this colony for a week while organizing and hosting public
activities.
Anne Apparu and visitors |
BHQFU on Avenue A |
In the mean time I continued
my investigations into the first case at the Flux factory. During summer there
was not much activity so I used this period to dig into the past of this artist
initiative. So I had a couple of meetings and conversations with Flux Factory
veterans. I will report on these observations and conversations in the specific
case journal.
I also had a meeting with
Fluxus artist Alison Knowles and asked her about what she knew about the Flux
Factory. There appeared to be no connection and both groups only heard about
each other but never engaged. The words "Flux" just like
"Factory" were in fashion at that time and expressed nothing more
then the space and activities these people were involved in as one of the early
Fluxers explained.
So by September my mood was
completely reversed. I entered the summer quite desperately and left it behind
with the comfortable position of studying three cases instead of two. I also
can say that I managed to enter three settings of situation art practices from
the bottom up, keeping aloof from data input that might be biased by pr and
marketing, and enforcing the credibility of my findings in this way.
And my discoveries continue
even after I stopped seeking actively. At the colony I met Alex White
Mazzarella, a situation artist with who I share a passion for situated art and
a view on what art may mean for common people and every day life. At a recent
flux factory event I met Sarah Murkett, an experienced curator working as an
art trader at Chelsea. With her I have had very interesting discussions on the
value and benefits of art, and the distinctions between high art, commercial
art, popular art, mass culture etc.
But from now on I will focus
on these three cases and harvest these rich data.
zaterdag 31 augustus 2013
In writing 04 - July 2013 - Well how?
"How does art make you smart?" is not a question about how art transfers certain specific bits of knowledge or skills from teacher to learner. That interpretation of the question would be irrelevant because it could be anything in every possible way. It could even be nothing because art also might just confuse you and just raise questions.
So does the question refer to the way that art makes you reflect on certain things then? Again my answer is "no". I think that art makes you smart when it allows you to learn what YOU want to learn and helps you to reflect on what YOU need to reflect on.
Getting smart is not about following a master, guru or teacher, aligning yourself to his values, and copying his knowledge and skills. Getting smart is about discovering your very own authentic set of personal talents, intelligence and sensitivities. Getting smart is learning what this precious personal gift means to others and being encouraged to oblige yourself to develop it and put it to use.
So art makes people smart not by telling them what to do or think, but by allowing them or challenging them to position themselves publicly as subjects, so they can find out who they are, what they are capable off and what that means for them and for their community.
This way art gives us an opportunity to become active as human being and do more then to labor like animals or work like slaves. And it is this transition that adds the essential value we're looking for, in education but also in business or politics.
At the moment I'm writing an article for a special issue about learning democracy of the scientific journal "Policy Futures in Education". This issue explores the possible meanings of Gert Biesta's theory of public pedagogy. In this theory the ideas of thinkers like Ranciere, Mouffe and Arendt are combined to an insight that inspired my previous considerations. In my contribution I'll try to apply this theory on my first findings in my research.
So does the question refer to the way that art makes you reflect on certain things then? Again my answer is "no". I think that art makes you smart when it allows you to learn what YOU want to learn and helps you to reflect on what YOU need to reflect on.
Getting smart is not about following a master, guru or teacher, aligning yourself to his values, and copying his knowledge and skills. Getting smart is about discovering your very own authentic set of personal talents, intelligence and sensitivities. Getting smart is learning what this precious personal gift means to others and being encouraged to oblige yourself to develop it and put it to use.
So art makes people smart not by telling them what to do or think, but by allowing them or challenging them to position themselves publicly as subjects, so they can find out who they are, what they are capable off and what that means for them and for their community.
This way art gives us an opportunity to become active as human being and do more then to labor like animals or work like slaves. And it is this transition that adds the essential value we're looking for, in education but also in business or politics.
At the moment I'm writing an article for a special issue about learning democracy of the scientific journal "Policy Futures in Education". This issue explores the possible meanings of Gert Biesta's theory of public pedagogy. In this theory the ideas of thinkers like Ranciere, Mouffe and Arendt are combined to an insight that inspired my previous considerations. In my contribution I'll try to apply this theory on my first findings in my research.
In the Field 08 - June 2013 - Food for thought
Also found Johnny Cupcakes store on Martha's Vinyard |
First case of my research is the art practice of Jeanne van Heeswijk. Her assistant told me that one of the first art projects Jeanne did was arranging a dinner. Not only the menu but also the location, the entourage, the seating at the table was composed to created a situation of optimal inspiration. Now as well in Rotterdam as in Liverpool one of the main activities Jeanne has initiated concern food: a neighborhood kitchen in Rotterdam and a bakery in Liverpool.
In the flux factory, my second case, I found out that for all the decades this organization exists they have had a thursday potluck at least every month and for a long period even every week. One or more artists would arrange the evening as an inspiring event and hard core "fluxers" consider this diner the core event of the factory.
In the flux factory, my second case, I found out that for all the decades this organization exists they have had a thursday potluck at least every month and for a long period even every week. One or more artists would arrange the evening as an inspiring event and hard core "fluxers" consider this diner the core event of the factory.
Soon after I came here I visited the Highline. Here one of the New York performance veterans of the Fluxus movement Alison Knowles staged a performance called "make a salad". Together with the audience she prepared a massive salad and handed it out for free to the audience.
By the end of may I was invited by performance artist Richard Jochum to attend to his monthly event "diner a vingt" at the art space of the Emily Harvey Foundation one of the former strongholds of the Fluxus movement. He told me he was not shire wether this event was art but he did present it a few days later at the Bushwick Open Studio's event. His presentation was part of a program called: "We eat We are".
By the end of may I was invited by performance artist Richard Jochum to attend to his monthly event "diner a vingt" at the art space of the Emily Harvey Foundation one of the former strongholds of the Fluxus movement. He told me he was not shire wether this event was art but he did present it a few days later at the Bushwick Open Studio's event. His presentation was part of a program called: "We eat We are".
My third case "the colony" at Moma Ps1 appeared to be hosted by Anne Apparu … food artist. No need to explain that one of the main activities were happening around the diner table.
Richard Jochum (2013) "Diner a Vingt" |
In real life 07 - June 2013 - Hardship and dispair
To prevent that my research would be led and my findings would be biased by marketing or status anxiety I decided to seek my cases from the bottom up by visiting locations to see for myself and ask the people on the spot where to go. This method is actually nothing more then good old fashioned adventurous exploration including the hardship of getting desperately lost.
If I would have been looking for quiet common cases - like traditional art or schools - it would not have been to hard but now I had to cope with a long period of desperate search for situated art practices. These practices are quiet rare but also hard to recognize. This way I ended up in most remarkable places meeting remarkable people but it took a long time before I did find suitable cases.
I knew it would be hard and uncomfortable and I expected that the knowledge that this was the only way to find this type of unspoiled data would pull me through. But still I had my moments of despair. What if I would not find anything? Or if I would end up with some cases that turned out top be unsuitable? Like marco polo of columbus returning home to face his funders empty handed.
Nevertheless I must say that it was all worthwhile the risk. I did find beautiful pure data behind the facades and unaffected by PR. And even though I ended up in a couple of more or less formalized and reputed institutions my entrance was the backdoor and I managed to find my way to the work floor.
Besides these fine data - and I did not anticipate on it - I must conclude now that this exploration not only led me to a couple of suitable cases it also gave me a very good view on the cultural context of the New York art scene.
So let me encourage other researchers to run the risk of unprepared exploration and ask for mercy from their employers to be merciful if their courageous endeavor does not bare glorious bounty. In science finding nothing is still useful information.
If I would have been looking for quiet common cases - like traditional art or schools - it would not have been to hard but now I had to cope with a long period of desperate search for situated art practices. These practices are quiet rare but also hard to recognize. This way I ended up in most remarkable places meeting remarkable people but it took a long time before I did find suitable cases.
I knew it would be hard and uncomfortable and I expected that the knowledge that this was the only way to find this type of unspoiled data would pull me through. But still I had my moments of despair. What if I would not find anything? Or if I would end up with some cases that turned out top be unsuitable? Like marco polo of columbus returning home to face his funders empty handed.
Nevertheless I must say that it was all worthwhile the risk. I did find beautiful pure data behind the facades and unaffected by PR. And even though I ended up in a couple of more or less formalized and reputed institutions my entrance was the backdoor and I managed to find my way to the work floor.
Besides these fine data - and I did not anticipate on it - I must conclude now that this exploration not only led me to a couple of suitable cases it also gave me a very good view on the cultural context of the New York art scene.
So let me encourage other researchers to run the risk of unprepared exploration and ask for mercy from their employers to be merciful if their courageous endeavor does not bare glorious bounty. In science finding nothing is still useful information.
zaterdag 13 juli 2013
In the Field 07 - may 13th 2013 - Rev Billy & the Golden Toads
Since my participation in the Jane Jacobs Walk on "Death Avenue", I considered to study the ways and strategies of some artists in the occupy movement. So I contacted them and joined a couple of meetings and rallies.
The occupy movement has become the new face of activist left. They rally against any capitalist excess and at the moment in NYC this is the new pipeline bringing radon contaminated fracked gas into New York City.
At the meetings I found out that this movement is actually very aware of its own strategy. This is discussed and developed on several platforms but a good source is the "Tidal" the movements theory magazine.
During the rallies I got rather intimidated by the massive presence of the NYPD. This, together with the consideration that in this case art was merely a vehicle for a greater cause, made me decide not to pick up this movement as a research case. Observing them felt a bit like spying and being a guest in this country I did not want to get into trouble with the police.
During the rallies I got rather intimidated by the massive presence of the NYPD. This, together with the consideration that in this case art was merely a vehicle for a greater cause, made me decide not to pick up this movement as a research case. Observing them felt a bit like spying and being a guest in this country I did not want to get into trouble with the police.
Notice reverend Billy (in the White suit) and his gospel choir the Golden Toads. |
Still I would like to share some footage I made during a rally at Bryant park. I want to give you an impression of present creative activism in New York.
Many of you probably recognize reverend Billy. He is a New York cult hero, preaching revolution while making good musical entertainment at the same time. He's been around since the Nineties. Check the documentaries: "Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping" and "What would Jesus buy?". I think the man has something to say.
In the Field 06 - May 09 2013 - Kitty City @ Flux Factory Queens
One of my "sources" here in the NY art scene tipped me about the Flux Factory in Queens. The project they are running at the moment is "Kitty City", a concept of Douglas Paulson. During the course of this month neighborhood kids will build a city for cats in a small factory hall during a series of workshops led by Elisabeth Hamby. They will be supported by architects, artists and designers. At the first of June the local pet asylum will provide about a dozen kittens to populate the city during a grand opening festival.
At the monthly Flux Factory potluck, every second Thursday - city poet Bob Holman reads his kitty city anthem; Ginsberg howled, Holman meows. Cat whisperer Moira Willams shows her new asylum: a NY plant seed refuge in her arm pits(!).
Moira Williams |
Also this month a couple of brooklyn bicycle repairmen will help you to fix and pimp your bike during a couple of workshops working towards a spectacular bike tour. I think I will hang out here next couple of months.
zondag 7 juli 2013
In the Field 05 - May 4th 2013 - Jane Jacobs Walk by Occupy
Every architect, urbanist, city planner, real estate developer, urban activist and community artist should read "The life and death of great american cities" written by Jane Jacobs in 1961. And most of them did. Jane Jacobs loved the city and that's why she explored it not on paper but in real life on foot walking through the neighborhoods. She is known as the saviour of many great building in New York City. But her greatest contribution was the insight that to develop a city we need to develope its community, starting with public awareness.
Jane Jacobs demonstrating for the preservation of New York's Penn Station |
In the US the Jane Jacobs is a phenomenon. All over the country so called Jane Walks are held. These are informative tours led by locals to raise awareness about the community and its urban living conditions. There is a national organization called "Jane Jacobs Walk" that is trying to keep track of these walks and organizing a nation wide city exploration festival on the 4th of May, Jane Jacobs birthday.
This Year I took part in such a walk held in one of Jane's favorite neighborhoods, the Meat Packing District at the west side of Manhattan. The walk was part of a city wide event organized by the Municipal Art Society of New York, and was led and designed (!) by a team of artists participating in the Occupy movement.
Considering my interest in situated art and informal public education I definitely wanted to take part in this. I considered it a great, peaceful and constructive way to participate as a citizen in politics. So I was completely surprised when there were almost as many police men turning up at the meeting point for this walk then there were citizen participants.
Anyhow we had a great walk with low profile ludic performances of professional actors like Kim Fraczek, Marina Tsaplina, & Monica Hunken together with lots of dedicated locals in a heart warming get together. (Watch my short video report) (Watch their online full length version)
I must say that americans have their way of giving a theatrical and dramatic turn to the things they do in public. And when singing the classic protest song "We shall overcome" I realized that there is a living tradition of democratic action in this country. The tour ended with a collective declamation of the famous poem "Don't go gentle into that good night" by Dylan Thomas. I must admit a had to swallow a sentimental sob to stand there speaking out that beautiful poem at the border of the river hudson.
So why on earth were these coppers following us? Well the tour was to raise awareness about the dangers of the fracking of natural gas near New York City. So the coppers were not protecting public order but the interest of the oil companies I concluded and I can not think of any other reason. Do you?
zaterdag 6 juli 2013
In the Field 04 - May 3rd 2013 - The next big thing in NYC
Most famous museums in New York are the Moma, the Metropolitan and the Gugenheim. But one of the most extraordinary museums I found is the "New Museum". It started in 1977 based on the critique that museums are only focussed on art that has already arrived.
To stretch your mind you could try to argue that once art arrives in a museum it's probably outdated. This is not bad, because good art has to be preserved. But if that is the only thing museums do then our attention might be fixed on the past and making us neglect the present and future. So what about a museum that tries to present art that is in development or yet to come?
Visionary founder Marcia Tucker gave the New Museum a head start with this mission. Now days many museums are thinking about a new position in a public domain that is also fed and led by new, social, media. They try to adapt their exhibitions to a more active and less docile audience.
Let's say that "only yesterday" culture was highly influenced by institutions and industries following a authority of merits or a logic of the market. The "old" media were "one to many" media, meaning that few people - those who were in control of the scarce media channels - were addressing a mass audience. The audience could either accept those few messages or turn away. Participation (reply, adaption, variation, alternation, etc.) was not a serious option.
Those days are gone and now we have all sorts of cultural constellations influenced by grass roots, peer groups and niche markets. The "old" media still exist but they are supplemented by the "many to many" (Youtube, Facebook) and "one on one" (WhatsApp, skype) social media. Slowly but irreversible there is a shifting power relation between the roles of "transmitter and receiver", "talker and listener", "maker and taker" and "producer and consumer" and we don't know if it will continue, bounce back or snap.
So museums as "presenters" might want to develop a new relation with their "receptors" and the New Museum is up front in this avant-garde. Producing traditional exhibitions is just a minor part of their activities. They step out of the frame, of the stage, the pedestal and out of the building. They organize workshops and events that concern contemporary living in New York.
I first got in touch with the New Museum on the Ideas City event. Part of the event was a market of ideas. Hundreds of bright New York minds presented their inventions and dreams on the streets around the New Museum. Another event was a public pitch of a handful of the most radical ideas to transform the city in one of the biggest churches of the city, Saint Patrick. After the pitches the public voted a winner. This was the so called "PlusPool". This installation would float in the waters around Manhattan island cleansing the water while at the same time offering a public swimming pool to the public.
I would say that at the moment the latest big thing happening in New York is the Highline. I don't have the impression that the next big thing in New York will be the Citibike project that was recently launched. So keep an eye on this plus pool project. New Yorks next big thing could be on the water.
New Museum NYC |
Visionary founder Marcia Tucker gave the New Museum a head start with this mission. Now days many museums are thinking about a new position in a public domain that is also fed and led by new, social, media. They try to adapt their exhibitions to a more active and less docile audience.
Let's say that "only yesterday" culture was highly influenced by institutions and industries following a authority of merits or a logic of the market. The "old" media were "one to many" media, meaning that few people - those who were in control of the scarce media channels - were addressing a mass audience. The audience could either accept those few messages or turn away. Participation (reply, adaption, variation, alternation, etc.) was not a serious option.
Those days are gone and now we have all sorts of cultural constellations influenced by grass roots, peer groups and niche markets. The "old" media still exist but they are supplemented by the "many to many" (Youtube, Facebook) and "one on one" (WhatsApp, skype) social media. Slowly but irreversible there is a shifting power relation between the roles of "transmitter and receiver", "talker and listener", "maker and taker" and "producer and consumer" and we don't know if it will continue, bounce back or snap.
So museums as "presenters" might want to develop a new relation with their "receptors" and the New Museum is up front in this avant-garde. Producing traditional exhibitions is just a minor part of their activities. They step out of the frame, of the stage, the pedestal and out of the building. They organize workshops and events that concern contemporary living in New York.
I first got in touch with the New Museum on the Ideas City event. Part of the event was a market of ideas. Hundreds of bright New York minds presented their inventions and dreams on the streets around the New Museum. Another event was a public pitch of a handful of the most radical ideas to transform the city in one of the biggest churches of the city, Saint Patrick. After the pitches the public voted a winner. This was the so called "PlusPool". This installation would float in the waters around Manhattan island cleansing the water while at the same time offering a public swimming pool to the public.
I would say that at the moment the latest big thing happening in New York is the Highline. I don't have the impression that the next big thing in New York will be the Citibike project that was recently launched. So keep an eye on this plus pool project. New Yorks next big thing could be on the water.
zondag 23 juni 2013
In the field 03 - May 2nd - Returning from the dogs
-->
Richard Jochum, the artist and professor I met before also invited me to participate in
his next performance that would be staged at the Elga Wimmer Gallery in Chelsea (Mid-West Manhattan). The name of the exhibition was
"Don't feed the animals" and it showed work of artists that performed deviant behavior in public as
I would summarize. Richard asked me to participate together with a dozen of others including
my guest Niek. See what happened in a performance
that would intervene with the opening reception at the gallery.
ps remember the performance of Dutch fluxus artist Wim Schippers: "Going to the Dogs"
ps remember the performance of Dutch fluxus artist Wim Schippers: "Going to the Dogs"
Real life writing in the field 00 - April 30th - Remedy for the modernist hangover?
My friend Niek came to visit me the 25th of April. The
first couple of days we stayed at the Morningside Heights right next to the
Columbia Campus. We stayed with Rahul and Susham Bedi. Susham appeared to be a well-known Indian writer and former movie
actress. The house was filled with colonial paraphernalia like panther and
tiger skins pinned to the wall, and at the first floor there was a private
primary school. We were not staying in a BnB but in the decor of a novel.
April 30th, Niek told me there was a
symposium about the modern Avant-Garde right next door in "Das Deutsches
Haus". Together with the crowning of a new Dutch King and the tiger skins
at the wall of our hospice it all made sense to me. So within a few seconds we were listening to a series of lectures
on the "Modernist Hangover" of the Avant Garde in literature and art.
Now, it could have been the acoustics,
or maybe the limitations of our understanding of academic English, but we had a
hard time understanding what was said. The second speaker spoke about an artist group called "Tiqqun" and their "Theory of
Bloom" but unfortunately I could not properly hear her elucidation.
Nevertheless musing on these few fragments of information I had a stroke of
insight.I was thinking something like:
What could be the modernist hangover? I guess the acknowledgment of the limits of human ability to fully understand the world and control its destiny. For post modernists this would mean a liberation of the totalitarian rationalization of every aspect of human existence. But for the hardcore modernists this surrender would be a defeat, a failure of the modernist project.What could "Tiqqun" mean in this context? It is the name of a contemporary art magazine that seems to refer to the Jewish word "Tikkun Olam", meaning "repairing the world". In the context of the modernist hangover it might suggest that we should not focus on changing the world but on fixing it. We might not be able to mold the world completely according to our will, but we might be able to put ourselves to the task of adjusting, rectifying and modifying it the best we can, everyday over and over again until eternity.And what about the "Theory of Bloom"? I figure it suggests we should think of development of the world in lifecycles instead of linear trajectories from imperfect to perfect. The world will never reach a final stage of perfection. But it will bloom every now and then. And if we treat it well and dedicate our selves to the work of "Tikkun" it might bloom more luscious, and more often.
I am pretty sure this interpretation is
my own and does not match the version of the speaker or the artists she was
talking about. Nevertheless I find this line of thought very inspiring as a
perspective to move on past modernism.
Maybe these "Tiqqun" artists could be a new case in my research. I
will definitely sort them out the next couple of days.
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)