Three reason why I love New York(ers)
1 NY enjoys street-life; they love the small outdoors and don't bother keeping up appearances.
Watch video of a collision of street vendors, bums and a pissed brass band.
2 NY knows that art first of all is a way of live before you may sell it or turn it into a career.
Watch video of one of the numerous community gardens and urban farms.
3 NY poors out energy everywhere and the peeps moves on through like they just don't care.
Watch video of a Saturday after noon at Broadway and Union Square.
Nowamsane?
zondag 20 oktober 2013
maandag 14 oktober 2013
Abstract
What is
this all about?
Economists suggest that creative cities breed
innovative economies. Statistics show more patents, intellectual property
claims and more new innovative start-ups at cities and regions where more
artists work and live. So art may play an important role in a learning society
but the big - until now not well answered - question is: How? How does art make
us smart? So I'm not thinking about art therapy, art education or community
art. I am thinking about the catalyst effect of artists on the growth and
flourish of their community.
What am
I doing?
I'm digging into a couple of cases of
innovative and trend setting art practices and art scenes in urban
environments. At the moment I'm talking with artists who are upfront in
colonizing new spaces and setting trends in NYC hotspots like NW Brooklyn, East
Village and SE Queens. And to clarify their statements I observe and
participate in their practices. I want to know how they work on a daily basis
and how they involve the public in their work and practice. I want to find out
how the conversation between them and their community is shaped and how
learning opportunities may occur in these settings.
Why
NYC?
I don't need to explain that New York City is
happening, economically as well as artistically. Besides that it is clear that
NYC and the Netherlands have a lot in common, historically, economically and
culturally. You could claim that NYC is (New) Amsterdam in overdrive. Best New
York practices could very well be exported to the Netherlands, perhaps adapted
in scale and pace.
At the same time I'm studying best practices in
the Netherlands to compare them with the New York cases. Until now I studied
Freehouse in Rotterdam, and more Dutch cases will follow in 2014.
In real life 08 - October 2013
When I opened the paper bag the suspense wasn't over yet. In the bag
there was this cardboard box with a picture on it of a man with presumably
adorable ladies at each of his sides. "Make it a big night. Do late night
Right" the box red. Checkers does not sell fries. They sell self-esteem.
Browsing the shop at
MoMA Ps1 it occurred to me that most art magazines did not have works of art on
the cover but people. Apparently we are more interested in the makers then in
the actual work of art. Maybe art is nothing but a vehicle to move into a way
of life that we desire and that these artists are role models for this
lifestyle. Maybe we don't even really enjoy the art they are making, we just
want to be with them, be seen in their company.
When I opened the box at checkers I was shocked
watching the content. I understood that the cover was necessary to contradict
my gut feeling and reduce my feeling of guilt. Here the comparison with the art
magazine seems to go wrong. The works of art within the wrapping of the magazine appear to be
far more tasteful then the loaded fries. I do not see any need to contradict my
gut feeling or to reduce my feeling of guilt. So why do these art magazine covers focus
on the artist instead of on the work of art?
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)